Africa Risk-Reward Index
Multinational companies (MNCs) operating in China are finding that their China-based competitors are innovating rapidly, adopting a fast-to-fail approach for product development: innovate and launch it on the market. If it succeeds, run with it; if it fails, rip it out and try again.
Gone are the days of multi-year development cycles for new products for China, and MNCs are finding it hard to keep up. Many MNCs are trying to become more local to maintain market share and capture new opportunities.
MNCs are therefore considering bringing more Intellectual Property (IP) into China or developing more IP locally, so they too can innovate more rapidly – but risk management efforts are struggling to keep pace. More than ever, MNCs are concerned about losing IP to competitors as they transfer R&D projects into China under localisation strategies. Engaging in local partnerships while facing uncertainties on how to handle disputes and infringement in the current local legal framework adds to MNCs’ wariness.
It is important to note that if risks are properly managed, there are significant opportunities for well-planned localisation efforts. Benefits vary widely across industries and locales, but can include:
The starting point is to include commensurate planning for IP risk mitigation as a component of any localisation strategy. The first step is asking whether your current practices are commensurate with your awareness of risks by conducting vulnerability assessments and process reviews. The next step is to understand typical challenges to IP protection, followed by creating a bespoke IP risk management programme.
Historically, employee theft, counterfeiting and infringement have been common challenges for businesses operating in China. This is why MNCs previously chose to keep critical IP outside China. According to an InterChina - Control Risks survey, which drew from a unique data set that benchmarked nearly 180 MNC executives in March 2024, some 27% of respondents listed innovation and IP-related work in China as the localisation initiatives that pose the greatest risk, ranking first among all options. Although awareness of IP risk is high, operational capabilities to address these risks lag behind.
While many MNCs had departments called “R&D”, they did very little research and mostly focused on development, localising foreign IP for the China market. As a result, operational security (including physical and data security) was often quite lax. As MNCs look at bringing IP into China (and developing more in country), they need to adapt their operations to protect their assets and know-how. To capture new market opportunities, MNCs need to take new approaches to identifying risks, improving IP security and creating a safe space to host and leverage IP.
Typical gaps that MNCs need to address are:
“Whack-a-mole” mentality: Businesses tend to take a piecemeal or superficial approach to management, reacting to problems as they occur, instead of anticipating and preventing them before they can take place. Businesses often fail to proactively identify their IP, let alone implement controls and train employees to protect it. Protective efforts are frequently not considered until after a serious breach has occurred.
Cost controls: IP protection cannot be separated from a company’s overall investment in internal controls. Businesses often face a dilemma: cost management versus investing in securing IP. Processes associated with scrapping and recycling are often low priorities for investment in control improvements. While waste and scrap disposal bring non-operating income to a company, even well-intentioned recycling efforts can present a security risk, as failing to properly destroy sensitive, confidential or valuable IP scrap material can encourage counterfeiting and IP loss. Control Risks worked with a client that found “scrapped” new development products on the market after being transferred to a recycler. The disposal of scrapped goods was handled without onsite destruction, so the scrapped pre-release goods could have been repackaged for sale or reverse engineered.
Inadequate processes: Production processes are often not created or reviewed from an IP risk perspective. Rather, they focus on manufacturing goods efficiently in an environment that continually evolves to reduce waste and inefficiency. The concept of “waste” in the context of lean manufacturing does not account for losses due to malfeasance. In addition, manufacturers generally have inadequate compliance policies, training or reporting methods to encourage employees to report suspected misconduct. Insufficient checks and balances also cause IP losses. A lack of cross-functional controls leads to supervisory weakness.
To achieve operational success in China, businesses should develop an IP protection programme that: 1) identifies IP (both current and future); 2) conducts a gap analysis of protective measures, looking at what should be in place versus what is currently in place; and 3) assesses current vulnerabilities using an investigative mindset. From a compliance perspective, it is critical to shift from a reactive management style to one that encourages employees to speak up on matters related to IP protection.
MNCs should conduct an onsite risk assessment of procedures related to surveillance, storage, production, packaging, waste and scrap management. This will identify vulnerabilities regarding IP, check whether these are in line with corporate SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) and ensure that there is robust information technology to mitigate unauthorised access to critical IP.
In lean manufacturing, a “Gemba walk” refers to an informal visit to the production line in which managers make first-hand observations of the manufacturing environment in terms of quality, safety and general tidiness. By using an investigative mindset, Gemba walks can be an invaluable tool in pinpointing control gaps.
Here are a few tips for investigators on Gemba walks:
A number of internal steps can be taken to improve IP security:
Developing resilience in IP protection in China is more challenging than ever before. Companies need to have deeper insights into what their key assets are and where their vulnerabilities lie. Stakeholders need to embrace the scepticism associated with having an investigative mindset to temper manufacturing experts’ focus on efficiency, quality and the elimination of waste. They should establish a robust IP protection programme that covers both preventative measures as well as response and containment capabilities, building awareness among employees.
A mix of formal and informal assessment processes can help prevent costly breaches and reactive investigations, and internal controls and compliance improvements can help break the cycle of knee-jerk responses. Keep your China business resilient by making IP protection a key component of your localisation strategy.